Reservation System in J&K: A Step Forward or a Step Backward?
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirKDIaDjHwGlWbZyqaFa954avLzHyRp51Bm6176Qjp7mZfV8WOLBJnafwB3VSK3_qs9kMVMs2GIOxydTxtMSadudxKv-DN3_mUySI-FboJBvWIh1RTtC5ZHYesyZeTzqoCKWOs-xVvSSsskGDx2EVt2JnpgxN6BtSJf1UMBQgk-DSueePKMr8s4wDZ6iA/w640-h640/DALL%C2%B7E%202024-03-27%2016.54.01%20-%20Create%20an%20illustrative%20image%20depicting%20the%20reservation%20system%20in%20jobs.%20The%20image%20should%20show%20a%20visually%20engaging%20scene%20of%20a%20job%20fair%20or%20office%20setting.webp)
✍🏼Ikkz Ikbal The Jammu and Kashmir administration has recently approved 10% quota for newly added tribes. This has pushed the overall reservation quota to 70% in Jammu and Kashmir. The decision has sparked a debate over the very essence of fairness and opportunity. Representative picture The decision to increase the reservation quota to 70% at the expense of open merit is a blatant disregard for meritocracy and fair opportunities. Some consider this move as a step towards social justice, but it has also sparked heated opposition with critics decrying it as a death knell for open merit. The controversy erupted from the amendment of the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Act, 2005. A decision was taken to appease political interests. The increase in Scheduled Tribe (ST) reservations by 10%, at the expense of open merit, has left many people feeling marginalized and disenfranchised. With open merit reduced to a mere 30%, the remaining 70% of the population has been abandoned, their hopes